Canadian politics · Provincial politics

Updated: Which of Canada’s legislatures tweet?

twitter logoIn recent years a great deal of attention has been paid to what Canada’s federal and provincial politicians say on twitter. But what about Canada’s legislatures themselves? Slowly but surely some of Canada’s federal and provincial legislatures have set up their own twitter accounts. However, the majority have yet to take the plunge, and there is tremendous variation among those that have in terms of the frequency of tweets, number of followers, and commitment to bilingualism.

Twitter can be an important tool for legislatures, allowing them to express information in a way that is unaffected by partisan spin. However, it also presents a number of challenges. In a recent blog-post, British academic Cristina Leston-Bandeira explored how social media (Twitter and Facebook) are being used by legislatures world wide, and the challenges that they face in doing so. While noting that the Inter-Parliamentary Union has called for its members to expand their use social media, she also stresses that the spontaneous, personality-driven character of social media makes it hard for most legislatures to utilize. In particular, legislatures are procedurally-driven and represent a wide range of opinions, not a single voice. The operation of regularly updated social media feeds also requires a sustained investment of resources. Overall, she concludes that most legislatures use social media primarily as a broadcast tool for reporting on parliamentary activity.

As can be seen in the table below (compiled on 24 March 2014), twitter coverage for Canada’s federal, provincial, and territorial legislatures is far from universal, with just under half operating an account. Most surprising is that while the Senate and Library of Parliament are both on twitter, the House of Commons has not yet followed their example. Similarly, two of Canada’s three largest provinces (Ontario and British Columbia) also lack a twitter presence.

While I do not currently have the time or resources to subject these twitter accounts to the kind of content analysis undertaken by Dr. Leston-Bandeira, a brief non-systematic review of each account would appear to support her finding that they are primarily used for reporting on parliamentary activities. However, the table shows some sharp differences in the number of tweets and followers for each legislature – differences that cannot always be explained by the length of time the account has been active or the population of the province.

For instance, it is not surprising that the legislative chamber with the most followers is the Canadian Senate given that it represents citizens from the entire country. However, the Library of the National Assembly of Quebec actually has far more followers than the Federal Library of Parliament, despite the former’s account having been created first. Similarly, the account for the Legislative Assembly of PEI (Canada’s smallest province) was created six months after that for the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan (which has eight times as many people), yet the PEI account has produced over three times as many tweets and has nearly the same number of followers.

It is possible those with more legislatures followers have simply gone out of their way to build their online presence. However, these variations suggest that differences in the content provided and frequency of posts may lead to different levels of interest from the public.

Also notable is the extent to which the twitter accounts of Canada’s legislatures reflect the country’s language dynamics. In keeping with the officially bilingual status of the federal parliament, both the Senate and the Federal Library of Parliament tweet in both official languages. However, no provincial or territorial legislature maintains an account in a second language. This choice is somewhat unexpected given that legislatures of the Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Quebec, and Saskatchewan all maintain at least partially bilingual websites. It is also possible that the perceived need to provide bilingual – or in the case of Nunavut trilingual – twitter feeds might be keeping some jurisdictions from joining twitter given the resources that would be consumed.

Overall, the social media activities of Canada’s legislatures would appear to be ripe for further study. In particular, it would be interesting to see what prompted those engaged to start tweeting, and also why others have opted to stay on the sidelines. More important though is the need to explore whether the presence of such a feed makes a notable difference in citizens’ awareness and engagement with politics.


Update: It turns out that the Legislative Assembly of Ontario (or at least part of it) does tweet after all! The Assembly’s Education Program has the twitter account @ONPARLeducation, which posts in both official languages to promote its programs and raise awareness of the legislature’s history. See the correction post for more details.

Advertisements

One thought on “Updated: Which of Canada’s legislatures tweet?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s